The whole "is it or isn't it a Smart" is quite boring and it seems to be the fanboys who bring it up.
I was one of the few people who, in a secret forum, started the "ForFour isn't a real Smart" for a wind up.
It was simply so we could all have some banter and bring a bit of fun back to Funkysmart as it was back then.
I was expecting the ForFour owners to joke about the poor reliability of the ForTwo engine and the fact that the Roadster leaks.
1 big jest circle. However this backfired when the ForFour owners couldn't take a joke, who'd have thought it.
The problem is that the ForFour was just another 4 door car to most of the original buyers so they didn't have the same mentality
as the existing Smart owners (who are mainly freaks).
I am the first to admit that i'm not a fan of the ForFour. I like the fishy front but the back is too similar to other cars.
The original "reason" that the ForFour wasn't a real Smart was through Smart's own literature, which stated that the average occupancy
of a vehicle was 1.4 people, so the Smart car generously gave you 2 seats, therefore, if it's got more than 2 seats, it's not a Smart.
Don't get a*sy, it's a joke.
It wouldn't stop me buying one if it was cheap enough. If you like your car then who cares what other's think.
That's what happens on the internet, Apple vs Android, Ford vs Vauxhall, Playstation vs Xbox etc.